New report

Responsible AI can help science tackle the planetary crises

"AI for Biodiversity" by Nidia Dias & Google DeepMind via betterimagesofai.org. (CC-BY 4.0).

Artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping almost every aspect of society. Now, a new international report argues it could also help accelerate science and research about climate change, biodiversity loss, and other urgent crises related to planetary boundaries.

Responsible uses of AI for sustainability research and governance is an opportunity the world cannot afford to miss, the report concludes.

AI for a Planet Under Pressure, released 5 November in Brussels, explores how AI can be responsibly harnessed to accelerate progress in governance and sustainability science. Produced by Stockholm Resilience Centre and the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), the report brings together insights from more than 30 experts worldwide, and analyses of 8,500 scientific articles. It outlines both the vast potential and the ethical considerations when applying AI to sustainability research and decision-making.

“Our question was whether AI can help strengthen science and support decision-makers in navigating the intertwined crises of climate change, biodiversity loss, and inequality,” says Victor Galaz, Associate Professor at the Centre and the Beijer Institute of Ecological Economics, lead editor of the report. “Our results show clearly that AI holds vast potential to advance science for action, but that potential will only be realized if researchers, policymakers, companies, and funders work together to ensure AI is used responsibly, fairly, and with a clear purpose.”

Key insights and recommendations from AI for a Planet Under Pressure:

  • AI offers vast potential to accelerate progress in research about sustainability, sharpening decision-making and clarifying complex environmental challenges.
  • Current AI research in the climate and sustainability areas does not focus on the most vulnerable regions and communities in the world.
  • Realizing the potential of AI for sustainability requires directed investments, and tackling AI’s environmental footprint, inherent biases, and unequal access to ensure its development and use are responsible and equitable.
  • Investments in AI for Sustainability Science should focus on energy-efficient, equitable, and transparent uses of AI that links science to real-world action, in close partnership with communities and others affected by the repercussions of climate change and other planetary pressures.

The report’s eight issue areas in sustainability science connected with the most frequently used methods and applications of AI, grouped by AIgeneration. Analysis includes 5,600 articles.

Systematic analysis of 8,500 studies

The report draws on a systematic review of 8,500 scientific publications and deep expert analyses across eight sustainability themes, including preparing for future shocks, understanding climate change and other complex Earth systems, prospering urban areas, stewarding oceans, and securing freshwater for all. It shows how AI can uncover hidden patterns in environmental data, model risks more accurately, and support better collective decisions.

Drew Purves, Nature Lead at Google DeepMind, who contributed to two of the report’s chapters, notes: “AI has enormous potential to advance sustainability science. Realizing that potential requires deep partnerships across disciplines and across sectors.”

The report notes that AI’s environmental footprint, potential data biases, and unequal access to computational power needs attention. Addressing these challenges, they argue, requires governance frameworks, interdisciplinary collaboration, and ethical standards that put people and planet first.

“AI will not solve sustainability challenges on its own,” says Maria Schewenius, co-editor and PhD candidate at the Centre and the Beijer Institute of Ecological Economics. “But it can help us better understand complex systems, anticipate risks, and support decisions that safeguard both people and our living planet.”

Co-author Jonathan Donges, deputy-lead of the Earth Resilience Science Unit at PIK, highlights AI’s potential to illuminate the planet’s hidden patterns: “Earth is a deeply interconnected system. AI offers powerful tools to help detect feedbacks, thresholds, and tipping points that were previously invisible to science. That knowledge can help us deal with deep uncertainties and act in time to prevent irreversible harm.”

Transparency, inclusivity, and fair distribution

Elizabeth Tellman, Assistant Professor at the University of Wisconsin–Madison, adds a call for equity and inclusion in shaping AI’s role in sustainability: “We must ensure that AI systems serve the communities most affected by climate and environmental change. Equity, inclusivity, and shared governance must be at the heart of AI for sustainability.”

Complementing this perspective, Samuel T. Segun, Senior Researcher at the Global Center on AI Governance, Canada, underscores the role of governance in ensuring AI benefits are fairly distributed: “AI offers a powerful opportunity to bridge science and policy particularly in safeguarding the environment. However, if we want it to truly serve people and the planet, we must ensure that its benefits are equitably distributed and that governance frameworks prevent misuse.”

The report concludes that, responsible uses of AI for sustainability research are possible, and an opportunity the world cannot afford to miss. Breakthroughs in sustainability research driven by AI are not only within reach, they can also be essential for our collective future. The responsibility now lies with sustainability researchers, companies, technology entrepreneurs, funders, and decision-makers to shape AI development alongside human insight, guiding society toward better decisions for a safer, fairer, and more resilient planet.

Explore the full report AI for a Planet Under Pressure »

 

Watch a recording of the launch event below

Authors

Victor Galaz,1,2* Maria Schewenius, 1,2,6* Jonathan F. Donges,1,3,5 Ingo Fetzer,1,2,7 Erik Zhivkoplias,1 Wolfram Barfuss,9,10 Louis Delannoy,1,11,12 Lan Wang-Erlandsson,1,3 Maximilian Gelbrecht,3,13 Jobst Heitzig,3 Jonas Hentati-Sundberg,14 Christopher Kennedy,15 Nielja Knecht,1 Romi Lotcheris,1 Miguel Mahecha,16 Andrew Merrie,1,24 David Montero,16 Timon McPhearson,1,15 Ahmed Mustafa,15 Magnus Nyström,1 Juan C. Rocha,1 Masahiro Ryo,17,18 Samuel T. Segun,19 Anna B. Stephenson,20 Elizabeth Tellman,21 Felipe Tobar,22 Alice Vadrot23

*Editors

 

Affiliations

  1. Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Sweden
  2. Beijer Institute of Ecological Economics, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Sweden
  3. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Member of the Leibniz Association, Germany
  4. Google DeepMind, United Kingdom
  5. Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology, Germany
  6. Faculty of Engineering and Sustainable Development, University of Gävle, Sweden
  7. Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm, Sweden
  8. Transdisciplinary Research Area Sustainable Futures, University of Bonn, Germany
  9. Center for Development Research, University of Bonn, Germany
  10. Institute for Food and Resource Economics, University of Bonn, Germany
  11. Global Economic Dynamics and the Biosphere, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Sweden
  12. Swedish Centre for Impacts of Climate Extremes (climes), Uppsala University, Sweden
  13. School of Engineering and Design, Technical University of Munich, Germany
  14. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden
  15. Urban Systems Lab, New York University, USA
  16. Institute for Earth System Science and Remote Sensing, Leipzig University, Germany
  17. Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Germany
  18. Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Germany
  19. Global Center on AI Governance, Canada
  20. High Meadows Environmental Institute, Princeton University, USA
  21. Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA
  22. Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
  23. Department of Political Sciences, University of Vienna, Austria
  24. Planethon, Sweden
Topics: Anthropocene
Published: 2025-11-05

Related info

Involved Centre researchers
A collaboration by:

The work for this report was supported by additional funding from the Beijer Institute of Ecological Economics (Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences), and Google.org through ClimateIQ at the Urban Systems Lab at New York University (USA).

News & events