Few realistic scenarios left to limit global warming to 1.5°C
New study identifies the 20 most feasible scenarios that avoid significant overshoot of a 1.5°C target
- Of the over 400 climate scenarios assessed in the 1.5°C report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, only around 20 make realistic assumptions on mitigation options, without significant overshoot
- The researchers categorized the representation of these solutions in the scenarios as “reasonable”, “challenging” or “speculative”
- The authors also took a closer look at the scenarios provided by the International Energy Agency and the ‘Sky’ scenario produced by the Shell oil and gas company
PULLING LEVERS: There are many published scenarios of greenhouse gas emissions that stabilize global average temperature at 1.5°C, in computers at least.
But which of these scenarios are realistic and which ones might be pie in the sky?
A new study published in Environmental Research Letters groups solutions to address the climate challenge into three categories: reasonable, challenging or speculative.
Of the over 400 climate scenarios assessed in the 1.5°C report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), only around 50 scenarios avoid significantly overshooting 1.5°C.
Of those only around 20 make realistic assumptions on mitigation options, for instance the rate and scale of carbon removal from the atmosphere or extent of tree planting, the new study shows.
All 20 scenarios need to pull at least one mitigation lever at "challenging" rather than "reasonable" levels, according to the analysis.
The realistic window for meeting the 1.5°C target is very rapidly closing.
Five key levers
The researchers looked at five levers that will be key to driving down emissions:
- Decarbonisation of the energy system worldwide
- Massive scaling up of solutions to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere
- Transformation of farming and other land use
- Changes in consumer behavior such as reducing meat consumption
- Reducing greenhouse gases other than carbon dioxide.
They categorized the representation of these solutions in the scenarios as “reasonable”, “challenging” or “speculative”.
All scenarios that we find to be realistic pull at least several levers at challenging levels.
Lila Warszawski, lead author, the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
From emitters to stores of carbon
Co-author, Owen Gaffney from the Stockholm Resilience Centre says, “The scenarios that succeed in stabilizing temperatures at around 1.5°C have similar characteristics. By 2030, these scenarios have approximately halved carbon dioxide emissions and flipped farming and other land use, for example forestry, from being major emitters of carbon to starting to store carbon on aggregate.”
Those scenarios classified by the analysis as unrealistically optimistic most frequently tend to over-estimate carbon capture and storage potentials, while others over-estimate energy consumption or reduction of non-CO2 greenhouse gases like methane.
Still others make all too bold assumptions about dietary changes towards more plant-based food or about limited population growth.
Beware of pies in the sky
The authors also took a closer look at the scenarios provided by the International Energy Agency (IEA) in 2018 and the so-called ‘Sky’ scenario produced by the Shell oil and gas company. Both scenarios foresee net emissions falling to zero globally as late as 2070.
The researchers found that they do not lie within the corridor of carbon dioxide emissions over the next century that seems to offer a realistic chance of meeting the 1.5°C target. The Shell Sky scenario shows emissions levels in 2030 well above other scenarios considered in this study (see illustration below).
“The Shell Sky scenario has been called a pie in the sky, and that’s indeed what it is,” says co-author Gail Whiteman from the University of Exeter’s Business School.
“In the business community some still like it because it seems to offer, in comparison to other scenarios, a relatively easy way out of the climate crisis. Our analysis shows, however, that there are no easy ways out.”
“The necessary emissions reductions are hard to achieve, technically but also politically. Yet I think limiting warming at 1.5°C is worth just every effort because this would limit the risk of giving some tipping elements in the Earth system an additional push, such as ice sheets or ecosystems like the Amazon rainforest. As technical as this all might sound, it really is about assuring a safe climate future for all,” concludes co-author Johan Rockström from the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research.
Warszawski, L., Kriegler, E., Lenton, T.M., Gaffney, O., Jacob, D., Klingenfeld, D., Koide, R., Costa, M.M. et.al. 2021. All options, not silver bullets, needed to limit global warming to 1.5°C: a scenario appraisal. Environmental Research Letters [DOI:10.1088/1748-9326/abfeec]
General news | 2023-02-02
Three quick questions for Marcus Lundstedt, our new head of communications
We welcome Marcus Lundstedt, the centre's new head of communications, and have a quick chat with him about his new role
Research news | 2023-01-30
The best way to deal with shocks is by combining diverse responses
Humankind’s best chance to deal with looming turbulences and crises is by diversifying response strategies
Research news | 2023-01-30
Policymakers need to work more closely with researchers to fight the global food crisis
We are facing the worst food crisis in modern history – Sweden and the EU need to take action to shift how food is produced and consumed. That was the message from researchers to policymakers during a high-level meeting for the Swedish government at Stockholm Resilience Centre
Research news | 2023-01-19
Time for an "IPCC for the ocean"
Leading ocean experts propose a new International Panel for Ocean Sustainability (IPOS) to build consensus and inform policy
Research news | 2023-01-13
Going beyond dichotomies of local versus global food systems
Food systems are becoming increasingly stressed, but whether they are local or global is not the big issue
Research news | 2022-12-22
Overshooting climate targets could significantly increase risk for tipping cascades
Temporarily overshooting the climate targets of 1.5-2 degrees Celsius could increase the tipping risk of several Earth system elements by more than 70 per cent, a new risk analysis study shows