Bildtext får vara max två rader text. Hela texten ska högerjusteras om den bara ska innehålla fotobyline! Photo: B. Christensen/Azote
Dealing with rural poverty and the persistent hunger challenge
- Poverty and soil dynamics are deeply interlinked
- They jointly determine the ability to meet food security goals in rural areas
- The sequences of interventions affects effectiveness of poverty interventions
A blanket solution for persistent poverty does not exist. Researchers present three insights for action
NO SINGLE STRATEGY: Eradicating hunger goes hand in hand with alleviating global poverty, and depends on soil health
Agricultural interventions are commonly used for alleviating poverty in developing countries, particularly in rural areas where many of the world’s poorest people depend on their local ecosystems for food production.
However, solving the hunger challenge requires a deeper understanding of how exactly these interventions should be devised.
In a paper recently published in Ecological Economics, centre authors Sonja Radosavljevic, Jamila Haider, Steven Lade and Maja Schlüter develop a series of models to investigate the influence of economic well-being, agricultural practices and the state of the biophysical environment on creating conditions for persistent poverty in rural areas.
They further assess the effectiveness of different development interventions on poverty alleviation.
We show how poverty and soil dynamics are deeply interlinked and jointly determine the ability to meet food security goals in rural areas.
Sonja Radosavljevic, lead author
Three insights for action
The authors combine neoclassical economic growth theory (in order to test and expand some its underlying assumptions), with ecological theories of nutrient cycling, together with empirical knowledge on intervention and development strategies.
Three main insights emerge from their analysis:
- agrochemical inputs can reinforce poverty by degrading soil quality
- diversifying energy sources is in some cases a pre-condition for the effective application of other strategies
- conservation tillage, a popular intervention aimed at decreasing water and nutrient loss through evaporation and erosion, should be complemented with a sequence of other interventions to be effective
The need for multiple strategies
The authors conclude that the dynamic nature of poverty-environment interactions means that a blanket solution for persistent poverty does not exist.
Interventions that only address one single aspect may lead to ineffective or unintended outcomes.
Understanding the local context by carefully assessing the socio-economic situations of households, existing agricultural practices, as well as biophysical conditions such as a soil quality, nutrient and water availability, is required in order to devise a tailored combination of interventions suited for a given context.
“As our models demonstrate, effective poverty alleviation is often best achieved by a planned sequence of interventions, rather than just one strategy”, the authors conclude.
Podcast: The role of food in the pandemic: food security, shocks and transformations
The authors begin by constructing a dynamical system model of an agroecosystem prior to any agricultural intervention using systems of nonlinear ordinary differential equations. They then develop three models representing changes in the dynamics of the agroecosystem which result from agricultural interventions. The assumptions in the model are based on expert interviews and empirical evidence from literature on soil quality, nutrients, water, and economic aspects of poverty in arid areas. The reference model without any intervention is first analyzed, followed by an assessment of the effectiveness of different alleviation strategies and their combinations. The results and insights are then discussed in relation to other theoretical and empirical work.
Radosavljevic, S., Haider, L.J., Lade, S., Schlüter, M. 2020. Effective alleviation of rural poverty depends on the interplay between productivity, nutrients, water and soil quality. Ecological Economics Volume 169, March 2020, 106494
For more information about the publication, please contact lead author Sonja Radosavljevic.
Research news | 2021-09-24
Increased use of AI can create new sustainability risks
Research identifies four areas where the use of AI-technologies can create challenges for both people and planet
Research news | 2021-09-23
Water resilient food systems for future climates
In a statement published by the Global Resilience Partnership, a group of 31 globally diverse practitioners and researchers, sound a clarion call for water resilience to be brought to the forefront of building resilient and sustainable food systems
Research news | 2021-09-23
New book on how culture and context affect transformative change
The book provides insights from researchers, activists, public servants, the private sector and others across five continents
Research news | 2021-09-23
Why designing policies for extreme events requires a system overview
While low-cost, rapid responses to extreme events are needed, proactive measures are more important
Research news | 2021-09-22
How can intersectionality contribute to social-ecological systems research?
Intersectionality is firmly making its way into research thinking. What does it offer sustainability scientists?
Research news | 2021-09-21
Three things needed for successful climate adaptation in cities
Freiburg, Durban and Singapore show why combining social, nature-based and technological solutions to urban climate challenges can work