Bildtext får vara max två rader text. Hela texten ska högerjusteras om den bara ska innehålla fotobyline! Photo: B. Christensen/Azote
REFLECTIONS ON COVID-19
What cities need to learn from Covid-19
- Research has consistently demonstrated why it is important to give city people access to green spaces
- Residents and others must be given access to spaces where they can interact and enjoy biodiversity and restorative nature environments
- But access to green spaces is a class issue
If the coronavirus has taught urban planners anything, it is that public access to green areas is more important than ever
DISCLAIMER: This reflection presents insights that are relevant to the discussions related to both the causes for the pandemic and the solutions needed to build a more resilient, global society. Covid-19 affects all aspects of our lives, we want to help make sense of this tragedy, in empathy with all those suffering from it.
ACCESS NOT A STRAIGHTFORWARD THING: Social distancing may have helped curb the spread of the coronavirus, but it may have had a profound effect on people’s mental health. Elders risk suffering from anxiety and depression while children can be prone to develop post-traumatic stress symptoms.
Our research has consistently demonstrated why it is important to give city people access to green spaces. Parks and other green urban areas provide them with a much-needed opportunity to escape household confinement and enjoy a host of positive effects on their health.
Open areas also allow people to meet others, albeit at an arm’s length.
Data from Google shows how Sweden, which introduced softer measures of social distancing in comparison to other countries, saw a marked increase in movement volumes in public parks during the pandemic.
The right to use nature cannot, unfortunately, be taken for granted. Access to green spaces is a class issue.
Space, access and privileges
What needs to be done? For a start, two things to consider: provide space and access.
Modern cities often boast about their smart and efficient use of space. That can boost energy efficiency and the climate but it could have an effect on residents’ well-being.
Cities must also allocate plenty of space to nature. For increasingly dense cities this may appear to be a catch-22 but there are ways around it: first of all, special containment should not cause extreme densities, over-crowded streets and monofunctional neighborhoods.
Residents and others must be given access to spaces where they can interact and enjoy biodiversity and restorative nature environments. If researchers pressed for this before the pandemic, they certainly have reasons to push for it now.
But access is not a straightforward thing. The right to use nature cannot, unfortunately, be taken for granted. Access to green spaces is a class issue.
A study of Cape Town’s plant life, a city considered to be a global biodiversity hotspot, shows how post-apartheid and inequality is mirrored in and exacerbated by ecological patterns. Through apartheid planning different racial groups were provided designated areas in which to reside.
Privileged white people were allocated neighbourhoods that received excellent municipal services while black and coloured people were forcefully relegated to neighbourhoods with limited municipal infrastructure and services. This inequality is also reflected in plant cover and biodiversity. In the poorer areas, there are fewer green spaces.
Ownership defines access
Access also relates to ownership. Enjoying urban green areas is determined by whether they in private, public, or common hands (think exclusive residential parks in affluent parts of big cities).
Before the corona crisis densification policies resulted in a global surge in privatization of public spaces: former park lands was opened up to cater for private business-interests running cafés and other urban services. This will affect people’s ability to maintain social distancing.
We do not know what changes to people’s everyday life will ensue in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic. But some things should change and that includes the way we design our cities.
Samuelsson, K., Barthel, S., Colding, J., Macassa, G., Giusti, M. 2020. Urban nature as a source of resilience during social distancing amidst the coronavirus pandemic. Landscape and Urban Planning. Preprint DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/3wx5a
Anderson, P., Charles-Dominique, T., Ernstson, H., Andersson, E., Goodness, J., Elmqvist, T. 2019. Post-apartheid ecologies in the City of Cape Town: An examination of plant functional traits in relation to urban gradients. Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 193, January 2020, 103662
For more information, contact Stephan Barthel or Erik Andersson below:
Research news | 2021-09-24
Increased use of AI can create new sustainability risks
Research identifies four areas where the use of AI-technologies can create challenges for both people and planet
Research news | 2021-09-23
Water resilient food systems for future climates
In a statement published by the Global Resilience Partnership, a group of 31 globally diverse practitioners and researchers, sound a clarion call for water resilience to be brought to the forefront of building resilient and sustainable food systems
Research news | 2021-09-23
New book on how culture and context affect transformative change
The book provides insights from researchers, activists, public servants, the private sector and others across five continents
Research news | 2021-09-23
Why designing policies for extreme events requires a system overview
While low-cost, rapid responses to extreme events are needed, proactive measures are more important
Research news | 2021-09-22
How can intersectionality contribute to social-ecological systems research?
Intersectionality is firmly making its way into research thinking. What does it offer sustainability scientists?
Research news | 2021-09-21
Three things needed for successful climate adaptation in cities
Freiburg, Durban and Singapore show why combining social, nature-based and technological solutions to urban climate challenges can work