Bildtext får vara max två rader text. Hela texten ska högerjusteras om den bara ska innehålla fotobyline! Photo: B. Christensen/Azote
reforestation in China
Spot the planted tree
Reports on tree cover increase in China fail to mention commodity plantations is part of the increase
- Study from 2016 showed Chinese policies have led to tree cover increasing over 1.6% of China
- But study used the Food and Agriculture Organization definition of forest which combines tree plantations and native forests
- This can mislead the public and leave questions on biodiversity, carbon sequestration, and human wellbeing
China’s efforts to restore forests after decades of destruction have been widely reported in the media. In 2016, researchers Andrés Viña and William J. McConnell with colleagues showed that Chinese policies have led to tree cover increasing over 1.6% of China. Forests are essential for climate regulation, soil and water conservation and enhancing biodiversity.
Centre researcher Tracy van Holt said, “The paper got a lot of media attention, but I noticed something: plantations weren’t mentioned anywhere in the article.”
This matters, argues Van Holt, because if the policy is to encourage tree plantations rather than native forests, then different ecosystem services result and this may affect human wellbeing. Biodiversity is often lower in plantations, the net amount of carbon sequestered is not always straightforward and water flow in plantation watersheds may diminish because plantations need a lot of water, says Van Holt.
“Wondering where in the article the tree plantations were referred to, I dug further and found that Viña and colleagues used the Food and Agriculture Organization definition of forest.” Defining “forests” is an active conversation in academia.
The FAO combines tree plantations and native forests. “The researchers also used low resolution satellite imagery making it very difficult to isolate tree plantations from native forests.”
“By not clarifying what is meant by “forest”, the public was potentially misled,” says Van Holt. But by how much? Van Holt has analysed the media data and published her results in Science Advances.
According to Altmetric tool, which analyses social media, blogs and media articles relating to research papers, up to 783,000 people were misled. “We analyzed the tweets associated with the article and all 71 tweets referred to native forest returning—not one mentioned tree plantations.” “Out of the 19 news articles analyzed, plantations were mentioned 4 times and native forest terms were reported 41 times.”
“If it turns out that most of the tree cover is tree farms, then we need to know this. This is especially important because large “reforestation” efforts are underway. It is quite possible that instead of native forests returning that commodity plantations will be planted. What this means for biodiversity, carbon sequestration, and human wellbeing is unknown.”
Van Holt argues that if researchers and policymakers stop conflating native forests and tree plantations then “we may be able to identify which areas are most appropriate for plantations and where native forest should be restored”.
Van Holt and Francis Jack Putz classified the content of the 71 tweets available as of Friday, 15 April 2016, that linked to this article, which, according to Science’s Altimetric AQ5 tool, had an upper bound of 783,000 followers. We then recorded for the presence of tree cover (a neutral term that can include native forests and/or plantations), native forest (including forest conservation, forest cover, forest, forest recovery, reforestation, and forest regeneration), and plantation (plantation, tree plantation, tree crops, and tree farm) in the 19 news articles linked to Viña et al. (1). They also searched for afforestation and regeneration, although these terms are ambiguous.
Tracy Van Holt is an affiliated researcher, primarily working within the Global Economic Dynamics and the Biosphere Programme. Her research focuses on the social and behavioral dynamics or interactions of natural resource-dependent communities under different configurations of landscape and seascape change, market dynamics and spatial features.
General news | 2024-02-29
Johan Rockström awarded the Tyler Prize
Johan Rockström, professor and former director at Stockholm Resilience Centre at Stockholm University, now leading the University of Potsdam Institute for Climate Research, has received the world's top environmental prize.
Research news | 2024-02-20
Having good neighbours and few top predators make predatory fish populations more resilient
A regime shift is gradually spreading through the archipelagos of the Swedish Baltic Sea coast, where shallow bays, previously dominated by pike and perch have one by one become dominated by one of their prey species, the three-spined stickleback.
Research news | 2024-02-08
Eating new plant-based foods can be good for the environment, your health and your economy
Replacing animal-source foods with plant-based alternatives or whole foods decreases environmental impact, meets nutrition recommendations, and can be cost-competitive with the current average Swedish diet
Research news | 2024-01-29
Bird AI and sailing drones – green game changers for marine ecosystems
Groups of guillemots on an island in the Baltic Sea have unknowingly inspired how marine research can be done. Two AI-powered research projects can change how to monitor marine ecosystems – and potentially manage them in real-time
Research news | 2024-01-24
Centralised social networks can hinder innovation by making decision-making too similar
Social systems where influence is centred around one or two individuals can lead to pack mentality and groupthink in farming communities
Research news | 2024-01-23
Planetary Commons: Fostering global cooperation to safeguard critical Earth system functions
We should look at tipping elements of the Earth system as global commons, argue researchers in a new paper published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences