Antibiotic resistance

Every action counts: Global study shows countries can reverse increasing antibiotic resistance

Antibiotic lab in Thailand. Photo by Parinya Sroithongkham

A new study, led by Centre researcher Peter Søgaard Jørgensen, reveals that while global cooperation remains essential, countries have more power than previously believed to reduce antibiotic resistance through effective domestic interventions. But currently only a handful of countries are taking sufficient action.

The study, published in PLOS Global Public Health, is the first to assess the level of government intervention needed to improve the worsening situation on antibiotic resistance across 73 countries. The researchers find strong associations between the level of action a country reports and whether antibiotic use and antibiotic resistance increased during a 16-year period in the start of the 21st century.

Measures that curb resistance

A wide set of measures like monitoring antibiotic use, improving hospital hygiene, coordinating action across human health and livestock production, and investing in new treatment strategies are all likely to be needed to curb resistance at the national level.

“Too often, we hear that antibiotic resistance is an inevitable catastrophe beyond our control,” says Jørgensen. “But our study tells a different story—one of hope and agency. If countries act decisively, they can still make a difference,” continues Peter Søgaard Jørgensen.

Countries leading the way

The study shows that a handful of countries are leading the way, taking the necessary level of action to have a better than even chance to see reductions in resistance across the board. In 2016 those countries were the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden and UK. Six years later, in 2023, Japan, France, Malaysia and Denmark, have become the countries that are taking the most extensive actions.

“A positive trend is that between 2016 and 2023, 76% of all analysed countries, and 83% of low- and middle-income countries, were reporting to ramp up their actions,” says Peter Søgaard Jørgensen.

Amra action index by country 2016-2023

Levels of action on antibiotic resistance in 73 countries investigated in the study. An action index close to 3.7 is needed to have a better than an even chance of reducing antibiotic resistance across the board.

Every action counts

Although the findings indicate that high levels of action are needed to achieve reductions in antibiotic resistance, the research also finds that even incremental increases in action can be important. For every improvement in action, the magnitude of increases in resistance goes down and countries get closer to achieving a reduction in levels of resistance.

“The study’s findings send a clear message to policymakers: the time to act is now. By taking evidence-based steps, governments can protect their own citizens while also contributing to the global fight against resistant infections,” says Peter Søgaard Jørgensen.

Topics: Antibiotics
Published: 2025-04-30

Related info

The study is a collaboration between leading institutions such as OneHealthTrust, Johns Hopkins University, Cornell University, University of Geneva, the Stockholm Resilience Centre, and the GEDB programme at the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.

Read the full study here:

Association between national action and trends in antibiotic resistance: an analysis of 73 countries from 2000 to 2023

Share

News & events