Common pool resources
The cognition of the commons
The ability to monitor, evaluate and share our own cognitive processes can improve group decisions and enable more sustainable use of common-pool resources
- Collective use of common-pool resources, like fisheries and groundwater, run the risk of suffering from overexploitation
- New study explores whether sharing of “metacognitive information” can help groups overcome this and more sustainably manage collectively shared resources
- An agent-based computer model was used to study this issue in both “kind” and “wicked” environments
One of the oldest and most critical sustainability problems revolves around the collective use of common-pool resources, like fisheries, groundwater and pastures. Such resources run the risk of suffering from overexploitation if everybody acts only in their own interest, over-consuming the resource while depleting it for all.
Both experiments and field studies have, however, found that communication between local resource users can help to overcome this tragedy and improve resource management. This has mostly been explained by increased trust or solidarity, but now a new study published in the journal Cognitive Science explores whether the “sharing of metacognitive information” can also play a part. Unpacking what this actually means, one of the co-authors, centre researcher Nanda Wijermans, says:
“Metacognition is the ability to monitor and evaluate our own thinking, for example the capacity to reflect on which cognitive skills we use to succeed in a given task. In this study we explored how much the sharing of such metacognitive information can help groups to sustainably manage a collectively shared resource.”
The study was conducted together with Helen Fisher, its first author, who was a visiting researcher at the centre, and centre researcher Maja Schlüter. Helen Fischer now works at the Leibniz Institut für Wissensmedien in Tübingen, Germany, but the work was mostly done during her stay at the Stockholm Resilience Centre.
The three researchers applied an “agent-based model,” a sophisticated computer simulation used in many different disciplines to study the interactions between people and between people and environment over time. These models are built bottom-up meaning individual agents (people in this case) are assigned certain attributes (such as different behaviours and cognitive biases) and mechanisms in how they perceive and act in a given situation.
Our research highlights an overlooked mechanism which, among others, can explain why it is so important for groups all over the world to improve communication to enable more sustainable use of common-pool resources.
Helen Fisher, lead author
The agent-based model used in this case is called AgentEx-Meta and is a continuation of AgentEx, an SRC-Beijer collaboration that combines behavioural experiments and agent-based modelling to study the collective behaviour in the commons. AgentEx-Meta simulates repeated group decisions regarding a common resource, while varying the extent to which agents (people) have access to metacognitive information, both individually and as a group.
Kind and wicked environments
The model was run to simulate group interactions in two types of environments, “kind” and “wicked”. The first refers to situations where confidence in knowledge about the resource and accuracy are positively related. The second describes the opposite, wicked environments, where relying on people’s confidence about the state of the resource can be misleading.
The results showed that in “kind environments”, sharing metacognitive information allowed groups to reach more correct judgments. In “wicked environments”, on the other hand, groups using metacognition gradually formed less accurate judgments over time. In conclusion, the study did identify potential social benefits of metacognition in common-pool resource settings, at least when the information was explicitly shared in the whole group.
“Our research highlights an overlooked mechanism which, among others, can explain why it is so important for groups all over the world to improve communication to enable more sustainable use of common-pool resources,” says Helen Fisher.
News & events
General news | 2024-02-29
Johan Rockström awarded the Tyler Prize
Johan Rockström, professor and former director at Stockholm Resilience Centre at Stockholm University, now leading the University of Potsdam Institute for Climate Research, has received the world's top environmental prize.
Research news | 2024-02-20
Having good neighbours and few top predators make predatory fish populations more resilient
A regime shift is gradually spreading through the archipelagos of the Swedish Baltic Sea coast, where shallow bays, previously dominated by pike and perch have one by one become dominated by one of their prey species, the three-spined stickleback.
Research news | 2024-02-08
Eating new plant-based foods can be good for the environment, your health and your economy
Replacing animal-source foods with plant-based alternatives or whole foods decreases environmental impact, meets nutrition recommendations, and can be cost-competitive with the current average Swedish diet
Research news | 2024-01-29
Bird AI and sailing drones – green game changers for marine ecosystems
Groups of guillemots on an island in the Baltic Sea have unknowingly inspired how marine research can be done. Two AI-powered research projects can change how to monitor marine ecosystems – and potentially manage them in real-time
Research news | 2024-01-24
Centralised social networks can hinder innovation by making decision-making too similar
Social systems where influence is centred around one or two individuals can lead to pack mentality and groupthink in farming communities
Research news | 2024-01-23
Planetary Commons: Fostering global cooperation to safeguard critical Earth system functions
We should look at tipping elements of the Earth system as global commons, argue researchers in a new paper published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences