Making it easier to measure resilience in practice
Resilience assessments should be more grounded in theory to be applicable in practice, according to a new study
- Quicker and more generic approaches are needed in order for resilience assessments to be useful in practice
- Resilience assessments should be grounded in theory for them to be applicable in multiple cases and contexts
- Local communities’ capacity to self-organise and combine different types of knowledge and learning could be an important feature for resilience
CLEAR AS ICE: We talk a lot about resilience. But frankly, it is a fuzzy concept. It is highly abstract, with lots of varying definitions attached to it, which makes it difficult to assess in the real world.
We need quicker and more generic approaches in order to measure resilience and make it more applicable in practice
Juan Rocha, lead author
In a new study published in Global Environmental Change, centre researchers Juan Rocha, Carla Lanyon and Garry Peterson, set out to make resilience assessments a little less abstract and a little more grounded in reality.
“We need quicker and more generic approaches in order to measure resilience across different cases and make resilience theory more applicable in practice,” says Juan Rocha, lead author of the study.
Need for a strong theoretical foundation
The researchers developed a theory-based approach to assess resilience, grounded in adaptive capacity literature. Early definitions of adaptability are related to the capacity to learn, combine experience and knowledge, innovate, and adjust responses and institutions to changing external drivers and internal processes.
In addition to these earlier definitions, the authors added another layer to their framework that included features based on more recent theory developments and input from a wide range of experts and stakeholders. Combined, these definitions of adaptive capacity were used to design a coding scheme for capturing elements of resilience.
We hope that the effort we have put into this study can be used by others to develop more accurate and effective methods to rapidly assess the potential for transformation, resilience, and loss of resilience in social-ecological systems
Juan Rocha, lead author
Comparisons can reveal patterns
The research team compared 40 different cases from the Arctic region to test whether their theory-based approach could help reveal patterns of features shared by communities who maintained their livelihoods in the face of change.
“The strength of comparative analyses is that it is possible to extract patterns that go beyond individual cases. These patterns can then be used to help develop theory and inform management and governance strategies,” says Juan Rocha, lead author.
One of the patterns that the authors found in the Arctic cases, was that the capacity to self-organise and combine different types of knowledge and learning was especially important for the local communities’ resilience or ability to transform.
“We hope that the effort we have put into this study can be used by others to develop more accurate and effective methods to rapidly assess the potential for transformation, resilience, and loss of resilience in social-ecological systems,” concludes Juan Rocha, lead author.
The authors reviewed scientific literature on adaptive capacity and designed a coding scheme for capturing elements of resilience across the case studies. They then designed a template, together with experts, that informed case study selection and literature reviews. Finally, they applied a qualitative comparative analysis to conclude necessary and sufficient conditions for resilience, transformations and resilience loss in the 40 chosen Arctic communities.
Research news | 2022-11-25
Successes and shortfalls: reflections on COP27
In the wake of COP27, we gather reflections from centre staff who were involved on the ground.
Research news | 2022-11-25
Access to greenery and water goes hand in hand with human wellbeing during the pandemic
Green wedges and large nature areas are especially important for the young, elderly and unemployed, a new comparative study finds.
Research news | 2022-11-22
Fair access to water is a subjective issue in post-drought Cape Town
Who should pay for and benefit from water services? It depends on who you ask, finds a study that revisited Cape Town after its 2015-2018 water crisis
General news | 2022-11-15
Centre researchers listed among the world's most influential scientists
Carl Folke, Johan Rockström, Thomas Elmqvist, Per Olsson, Max Troell and Jonathan Donges ranked as some of the globally most cited researchers
Research news | 2022-11-14
In data scarce regions, fieldwork and historical images help researchers fill in the gaps
Researchers combined current data with historical images and inputs from previous studies to estimate how ecosystem services have changed over time in northern Burkina Faso
Research news | 2022-11-10
Fair global redistribution of resources is key for planetary stability
Redistributing resources and transforming society are necessary to ensure universal access to basic needs while staying within Earth’s limits