Why resilience and wellbeing don’t always go hand-in-hand
A too simplistic understanding of the two can leave the poorest and most marginalised people suffering
- Wellbeing and resilience both feature heavily in policy targets
- But assuming that the two automatically go together can have devastating consequences
- A more inclusive interpretation of the concepts can lead to better outcomes for people and the planet
NEVER ASSUME: Wellbeing and resilience to environmental changes are key goals of sustainable development, and they are often seen as linked or even interchangeable terms.
But a new paper, published in Nature Sustainability warns the two don't always go hand in hand.
Take the 2004 Asian tsunami as an example. New legislation in India and Sri Lanka prevented homes and businesses being rebuilt close to the coast in order to create buffer zones and build resilience to future tsunamis.
This forced people who depended on the sea for economic, cultural and social reasons to move to isolated villages inland, undermining wellbeing in diverse ways.
If these trade-offs had been thought through more thoroughly, then measures to ameliorate them could have been implemented alongside them.
Wellbeing and resilience feature heavily in policy targets. Assuming that the two automatically go together is not helpful. When this mistake is made, it is often the poorest and most marginalised people who suffer.
Tomas Chaigneau, lead author
Together with his co-authors, which includes centre researchers Tim Daw and Belinda Reyers, he wants to highlight the vital distinctions and connections between wellbeing and resilience ahead of the COP26 UN climate change conference so that policies can be better designed and ensure that addressing the climate crisis does not harm people’s wellbeing and livelihoods.
Responding to extremes in hot or cold temperature changes linked to climate change through air conditioning or central heating, for example, might improve human wellbeing and may even enhance our household resilience to such environmental and climatic changes, but in the long term, it can exacerbate climate change and won’t be good for either.
"A narrow focus on achieving resilience and wellbeing locally and in the near future, can lead to trade-offs elsewhere or in the future. We need to consider resilience and wellbeing at regional and global levels, and on timescales spanning generations," Tim Daw adds.
A website developed in relation to the scientific work provides an opportunity to explore some of these complex trade-offs.
News & events
Research news | 2023-10-03
Combining modeling and empirical research can give better sustainability insights
Mixing empirical methods and modeling can provide better insights into cause-effect relationships in sustainability, and improve governance
Stockholm seminars | 2023-10-11
How relationships contribute to and can help solve grand sustainability challenges
Michele Barnes, James Cook University, uncovers how relationships can mediate the drivers and outcomes of sustainability challenges
General news | 2023-09-19
New Google.org grant funds Centre research on AI-powered climate risk tool
Google.org has awarded five million US dollars to a group of scientists, including Centre researchers, to develop and scale ClimateIQ , an artificial intelligence-powered climate risk evaluation tool for cities
General news | 2023-09-19
Researchers and chefs team up for a sustainable lunch week
“Risotto on Swedish oat-rice, with apple cider vinegar, blue mussels from Bohuslän, parsley, and grated Svecia cheese”. That’s one of the science-cooked dishes that guests can enjoy at “A Planetary Lunch” — an experimental lunch week at Stockholm university
Research news | 2023-09-14
The SDGs are not on track — new report outlines what needs to happen
Humanity is set to miss the Sustainable Development Goals. But decisive and timely policy actions can kickstart extraordinary turnarounds and a giant leap toward achieving the SDGs
Research news | 2023-09-13
All planetary boundaries mapped out for the first time, six of nine crossed
For the first time, an international team of scientists is able to provide a detailed outline of planetary resilience by mapping out all nine boundary processes that define a safe operating space for humanity.