Bildtext får vara max två rader text. Hela texten ska högerjusteras om den bara ska innehålla fotobyline! Photo: B. Christensen/Azote
Planetary boundaries are global priorities for business action
- Science-business dialogues about planetary boundaries underpin more resilient action
- Today’s targets are ambitious but could undermine each other if tackled separately
- The planetary boundaries framework describes the multidimensional challenge
The complex interactions among the planetary boundaries can be challenging to grasp, but they play a critical role in the resilience of society’s responses to urgent global pressures. The SRC–L’Oreal research collaboration is focusing on the challenge of tackling multiple issues at once, in resilient ways.
More and more consumers want to know the environmental impact of their products, and businesses want to know what more they can do.
The SRC–L’Oreal research collaboration is working to find better ways to evaluate the resilience of company approaches to establishing sustainability action targets. The collaboration, which started in 2019, has been working to better understand how the SRC’s research could be applied to the beauty industry.
The centre approaches sustainability issues with both social and ecological aspects in mind. Resilience, as a concept, is useful in structuring our assessments of the links between business activities and Earth system changes.
In a globally connected world, every action’s influence transcends time and geography. Viewing a business as part of a complex world can help to better understand the effects of each business decision – and also to highlight which other questions companies should be asking.
This collaborative project started by applying the planetary boundaries framework, because L’Oréal and many other companies already track their environmental performance through science-based targets for climate, forested lands and water.
All steps towards reducing climate change, biodiversity harms, and natural resource use and waste are urgent and necessary.
But business steps to meet simple quantitative targets affect a complex social-ecological reality. If you think about this in terms of climate change, biodiversity, and natural resource use, action to tackle problems in one of those areas will likely have an influence, positive or negative, on the other areas.
Sometimes playing with a simple object makes us understand complexity in useful ways. Our planetary priorities Rubik’s cube does that. We could mess up lots of issues by focusing on just one! Or we can work towards more resilient outcomes on all fronts.
Sarah Cornell, principal invetigator
A toy with a serious message…
Thinking about a Rubik’s cube can help demonstrate the challenge. We can consider each side of the cube to be one of the priorities highlighted by the planetary boundaries framework, where current global trends are worsening: climate change, biodiversity loss, nutrient flows, land and water use, and pollution.
If we start moving the sides around, each movement changes the situation for other sides. For example, climate actions involving large-scale biofuel plantations can undermine biodiversity efforts, lead to water scarcity, or create other vulnerabilities.
But resilient approaches might be possible where the combined effects are kept in mind with every move.
Research news | 2022-11-25
Successes and shortfalls: reflections on COP27
In the wake of COP27, we gather reflections from centre staff who were involved on the ground.
Research news | 2022-11-25
Access to greenery and water goes hand in hand with human wellbeing during the pandemic
Green wedges and large nature areas are especially important for the young, elderly and unemployed, a new comparative study finds.
Research news | 2022-11-22
Fair access to water is a subjective issue in post-drought Cape Town
Who should pay for and benefit from water services? It depends on who you ask, finds a study that revisited Cape Town after its 2015-2018 water crisis
General news | 2022-11-15
Centre researchers listed among the world's most influential scientists
Carl Folke, Johan Rockström, Thomas Elmqvist, Per Olsson, Max Troell and Jonathan Donges ranked as some of the globally most cited researchers
Research news | 2022-11-14
In data scarce regions, fieldwork and historical images help researchers fill in the gaps
Researchers combined current data with historical images and inputs from previous studies to estimate how ecosystem services have changed over time in northern Burkina Faso
Research news | 2022-11-10
Fair global redistribution of resources is key for planetary stability
Redistributing resources and transforming society are necessary to ensure universal access to basic needs while staying within Earth’s limits