Bildtext får vara max två rader text. Hela texten ska högerjusteras om den bara ska innehålla fotobyline! Photo: B. Christensen/Azote
SUSTAINABLE COCOA PRODUCTION
Climate smart cocoa production in Ghana may not be all that smart
- Climate smart cocoa (CSC) aims to stop deforestation, increasing climate adaptation and mitigation and supporting smallholder livelihoods
- But challenges connected to tree tenure rights, shade trees levels, deforestation and agrochemical-dependence loom
- Equity concerns should form the core of any initiative looking to achieve sustainable outcomes
Production model promises triple wins for smallholders and the environment. That may be too good to be true
TOO HIGH EXPECTATIONS? Ghana is the second largest cocoa producer in the world, an estimated 95% is exported making cocoa the most important commercial crop in the country. But challenges loom. Land pressures, low global market prices and price fluctuations risk farmers’ livelihoods and the food security of around 800,000 smallholders.
Climate smart cocoa (CSC) has become a new umbrella term for sustainability and supply-chain initiatives that aim to address these multiple challenges.
In a study published in Frontiers in sustainable food systems, former centre master’s student Felix Nasser and centre researcher Grace Wong together with colleagues from University of Oxford, Forestry Institute of Ghana and University of Freiburg examine how stakeholders perceive CSC and how this is reflected in policy and practice.
They also look at what the implications of CSC are for cocoa smallholders through an equity lens.
Confronting equity concerns should not be considered as an appendage to climate smart cocoa policy – these issues should form the core of any initiative looking to achieve sustainable outcomes.
Felix Nasser, lead author
Winners and losers, not just winners
In interviews and focus group discussions with Corporate, NGO and governmental representatives as well as farmers and field officers reveal an expectation that CSC is a “triple win”: reduced deforestation, increased climate mitigation and adaptation, and improved smallholder livelihoods.
In short, an exciting business opportunity for smallholders.
Wong and her colleagues warn that when multiple goals are pursued by many stakeholders there tends to be winners and losers, rather than winners and winners.
The authors identify three key challenges that must be addressed if CSC is to achieve sustainable and equitable outcomes in Ghana’s cocoa sector:
1) vague tree tenures and complexities around optimal shade tree levels create risks of inequities;
2) there are potential rebound effects regarding deforestation relating to tree tenure and uncertainties in local governance
3) the risks of intensive use of agrochemicals are unequally distributed
Amplifying ignored voiced
Nasser concludes: “By continuing to side-line these issues, climate smart cocoa initiatives in Ghana may further marginalize those without influence and power, namely Ghana’s 800,000 smallholder cocoa farmers.”
However, if implemented appropriately, local governance structures governance structures could amplify smallholders' voices, which are either side-lined or wholly ignored by the triple win discourse.
He says: "Confronting equity concerns should not be considered as an appendage to climate smart cocoa policy – these issues should form the core of any initiative looking to achieve sustainable outcomes."
The authors used a mix of qualitative research methods, including a literature review of global discourses on Climate smart agriculture (CSA), semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions, participant observation, and transect walks. Data collection was conducted at multiple study levels, from international to farm level, and combined deductive and inductive approaches.
Nasser, F., Maguire-Rajpaul, V.A., Dumenu, W.K., Wong. G. 2020. Climate-Smart Cocoa in Ghana: How Ecological Modernisation Discourse Risks Side-Lining Cocoa Smallholders. Front. Sustain. Food Syst., 28 May 2020 https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00073
General news | 2024-02-29
Johan Rockström awarded the Tyler Prize
Johan Rockström, professor and former director at Stockholm Resilience Centre at Stockholm University, now leading the University of Potsdam Institute for Climate Research, has received the world's top environmental prize.
Research news | 2024-02-20
Having good neighbours and few top predators make predatory fish populations more resilient
A regime shift is gradually spreading through the archipelagos of the Swedish Baltic Sea coast, where shallow bays, previously dominated by pike and perch have one by one become dominated by one of their prey species, the three-spined stickleback.
Research news | 2024-02-08
Eating new plant-based foods can be good for the environment, your health and your economy
Replacing animal-source foods with plant-based alternatives or whole foods decreases environmental impact, meets nutrition recommendations, and can be cost-competitive with the current average Swedish diet
Research news | 2024-01-29
Bird AI and sailing drones – green game changers for marine ecosystems
Groups of guillemots on an island in the Baltic Sea have unknowingly inspired how marine research can be done. Two AI-powered research projects can change how to monitor marine ecosystems – and potentially manage them in real-time
Research news | 2024-01-24
Centralised social networks can hinder innovation by making decision-making too similar
Social systems where influence is centred around one or two individuals can lead to pack mentality and groupthink in farming communities
Research news | 2024-01-23
Planetary Commons: Fostering global cooperation to safeguard critical Earth system functions
We should look at tipping elements of the Earth system as global commons, argue researchers in a new paper published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences