Bildtext får vara max två rader text. Hela texten ska högerjusteras om den bara ska innehålla fotobyline! Photo: B. Christensen/Azote
Fishing is more than just harvesting, time to broaden the focus
- Using Mexican small-scale fisheries as a case study, the authors compare two different ways of organizing fishing – fishing cooperatives and patron-client relationships
- Trust and reliability in interactions influence pre-harvesting choices
- Actions connected to pre-harvesting, harvesting, and post-harvesting are critical for shaping outcomes
Broadening the analytical focus beyond harvesting is necessary in order to imagine new ways of governing the commons
BEFORE, DURING AND AFTER: Fishing is often synonymous with harvesting, yet harvesting is only one aspect of fishing. Pre-harvesting and post-harvesting activities such as preparing the outing, or negotiating with authorities and actors in control of production and commercialization channels, also significantly influence the outcomes of fishing.
In a paper published in Plos One, centre researchers Emilie Lindkvist and Maja Schlüter along with colleagues from the US argue that broadening the analytical focus beyond harvesting is necessary in order to imagine new ways of governing the commons.
Benefits of broadening scope
Using Mexican small-scale fisheries as a case study, the authors compare two different ways of organizing fishing – fishing cooperatives and patron-client relationships – and their effects on the distribution of benefits from harvesting.
Our study highlights the benefits of broadening the scope of inquiry beyond a narrow policy attention on harvesting to move towards a fuller understanding of commons dilemmas.
Xavier Basurto, lead author
Through in-depth interviews with fish buyers, and by gathering data related to the provision of loans to fishers, the authors shed light on how trust and reliability in interactions influence pre-harvesting choices such as access to credit, fishing means of production, or choice of organizational structure.
Incorporating new concepts
The authors conceptualize small-scale fishing as an array of linked action situations. An action situation is defined as a situation where individuals are faced with a set of potential actions which jointly produce outcomes, and in small-scale fisheries, can be categorized as pre-harvesting, harvesting, and post-harvesting.
Lindkvist and her colleagues argue that these collective action processes do not receive sufficient attention in literature, but are in fact critical for shaping outcomes particularly in terms of benefit distribution and fisher’s well-being.
The authors conclude that conceptualizing small-scale fisheries as an array of linked action situations offers a straightforward way to move beyond powerful imaginaries of fishing as harvesting.
"The risk is otherwise that we obscure considerations of activities and decisions that take place before and after harvesting, no matter how important they are.”
The authors first investigate how fish buyers select the fishers with whom to transact, by conducting in-depth interviews with fish buyers. They then assemble two longitudinal databases related to the provision of loans, one comprising data from patron-client interactions and the other from a fishing cooperative. By building a database of repeated interactions with each fisher, the authors assess how stable groups of resource harvesters are constituted. Using two conceptual devices anchored on institutional analysis – the concepts of constitutional levels of analysis and linked action situations – the authors then encourage the analysis of common-pool resources governance beyond harvesting.
Basurto, X., Bennett, A., Lindkvist, E., Schlüter, M. 2020. Governing the commons beyond harvesting: An empirical illustration from fishing. PLoS ONE 15(4): e0231575. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231575
Research news | 2022-09-29
Recent graduates reflect on what it’s like to do a master’s at the centre
Straight from their final presentations, MSc graduates Bérénice Robaglia and Nora Giertz share insights into their master thesis projects, time at the centre and future plans.
Research news | 2022-09-28
To curb biodiversity loss, development cooperation needs a rethink
Working paper highlights the need for development cooperation to adopt complexity-aware theories of change
Research news | 2022-09-23
Civil society could be the gamechanger for climate policymaking
To make climate policies fair and effective we need to harness the power of civil society, argues centre researcher Thomas Hahn
Research news | 2022-09-19
Turning food by-products into fodder could feed a billion people
Using waste from food production to feed livestock and aquaculture could help feed more people with less
Research news | 2022-09-13
Mutual interests and benefits are no guarantee for increased collaboration
Awareness of interdependencies may not promote, but instead even inhibit, exchange and dialogue between different policy actors
Research news | 2022-09-08
World at risk of passing multiple climate tipping points above 1.5°C global warming
Human emissions have already pushed Earth into the danger zone. Five of sixteen identified tipping point may be triggered at today’s temperatures