Bildtext får vara max två rader text. Hela texten ska högerjusteras om den bara ska innehålla fotobyline! Photo: B. Christensen/Azote
COALITION BUILDING AND CRISES
In some cases, a push and pull between interests can prevent unsustainable outcomes
- Non-state actors play an increasingly important role in shaping environmental policy
- The authors analyze an agent-based model inspired by EU Common Fisheries Policy to understand how competition between economic and environmental interest group coalitions sometimes delays or prevents resource collapses
- Timing is critical too. A late coalitional response to an emerging crisis may be ineffective to reverse a declining ecological trend
How resource management can benefit from competition between interest groups
THE LOBBYING GAME: Competition between interests is not always a fair game. Industry or other groups representing an economic interest can have a substantial advantage over other interests in resources and capabilities.
Policymaking typically involves a wide range of participants, from elected representatives and public officials to non-state actors such as scientists, businesses, and interest groups.
They may not always agree.
When it comes to environmental policy, non-state actors play an increasingly important role. In fact, lobbying by powerful influence groups is considered to be the root cause of policy stagnation and increased environmental degradation.
Delaying or preventing collapses
Surprisingly, competition between economic and environmental interest groups and the formation of interest group coalitions in response to crises, may also help avoid undesirable policy outcomes.
Published in Nature Human Behaviour, the authors analyze how competition between economic and environmental interest group and coalition building sometimes delays or prevents resource collapses, even when competing interests have unequal resources and influence.
Competition and, particularly, coalition formation may under some conditions serve as a mechanism for sustainable resource use despite dominance of industry interests.
Kirill Orach, lead author
In their study, the authors developed a stylized, agent-based model of interest group influence informed by a case study of EU Common Fisheries Policy reform.
By combining in-depth empirical cases with agent-based modelling Orach and his colleagues could explore the role of coalition-building mechanism within broader dynamics of the policy process, and identify conditions under which it could have an effect on resource management outcomes.
Timing is everything
In some cases, when a coalition of interests succeeds in influencing policy, opposing groups mobilize in response, leading to a “tug of war” battle for policy influence. The authors find that this tug of war between interest coalitions may have a surprising effect on resource management outcomes.
For example, a significant increase of fishing quota due to industry lobby could lead to a counter-mobilization by environmental coalition interests. This coalition gives them a better chance to push for a decrease in fish quota.
However, the model also showed that timing of such coalition response is critical. A late response to an emerging crisis may be ineffective to reverse a declining ecological trend.
The authors develop an agent-based model (PoliSEA) of a policy process embedded in the dynamics of a fishery. The model is grounded in empirical analysis of the success of environmental interest groups in attaining their policy preferences in the 2013 European Union Common Fisheries Policy reform. These empirical insights are combined with theory about the attributes and lobbying behaviour of interest groups and literature on interest groups in general, and EU interest groups in particular. Through this model, the authors explicitly focus on how the dynamics of the policy process interact with the dynamics of the social-ecological system.
Link to publication
General news | 2023-11-30
“We need to transition back within all Planetary Boundaries”
Phase out fossil fuels, transform the food system, and remove pressures on all planetary boundaries — in a just way. Centre researchers send a clear message to all participants at COP28
General news | 2023-11-28
Putting resilience at the heart of COP28
Stockholm Resilience Centre will host and join a range of activities at COP28. The participation is done in close collaboration with the Global Resilience Partnership and our development programme SwedBio
General news | 2023-11-27
First Swedish national citizen assembly on climate could show the way to transformation
Can a citizen assembly come up with ideas on how Sweden could live up to the Paris Agreement? This will be tested in a new collaboration of Swedish universities, which Stockholm Resilience Centre is a part of
General news | 2023-11-15
Researchers from the Centre listed among the world’s most cited
Four researchers associated with Stockholm Resilience Centre made it onto the 2023 Clarivate Analytics overview, a ranking of the most cited scientists in the world
Research news | 2023-11-14
Norms must change in order for academia to walk the talk on sustainability, new paper argues
Sustainability research is rarely sustainable, neither for the planet nor for academics, argues a new paper. In it, researchers call for a rethink of current norms and practices
Research news | 2023-11-13
New research maps 14 potential evolutionary dead ends for humanity and ways to avoid them
Humankind risks getting stuck in 14 evolutionary dead ends, ranging from global climate tipping points to misaligned artificial intelligence, chemical pollution, and accelerating infectious diseases