Bildtext får vara max två rader text. Hela texten ska högerjusteras om den bara ska innehålla fotobyline! Photo: B. Christensen/Azote
A FOREST IS MORE THAN JUST A FOREST: Research on social-ecological systems (SES) has highlighted their complex and adaptive character, but is something amiss in how we gather and apply knowledge about these systems?
Despite recognizing their dynamic characteristics researchers often base their analyses on parts of the systems that are isolated and static.
In a study published in People and Nature, centre researchers Tilman Hertz, Maria Mancilla Garcia and Maja Schlüter argue for a way to close the gap between how we say we view SES and how we treat them in research and practice.
Hertz explains “We talk and think in terms of things and entities that are stable, unchanging and have a defined set of properties. This is understandable, because doing so allows us to control, predict and manage our environment.”
However, he continues, this means that we might run the risk of neglecting what situatedness of people, as well as the social-ecological processes which influence who people are, or which processes people realize at any given moment.
People are not the same across contexts, nor do they behave the same. Hence, we need ways that allow us to account for the many processes and relations a person is embedded it.
Tilman Hertz, lead author
The authors reason that this mismatch stems from what in research is termed ontology – the way we describe things.
"Our paper presents an alternative philosophical perspective that allows us to see change as being more fundamental than stability," co-author Maja Schlüter adds.
The ontologies that underlie the tendency to divide SES into parts and describe them as sometimes stable entities have influenced most of contemporary science and are what is called “substance ontologies”.
They assume that reality is made up of objects that exist independent of each other.
Instead, the authors argue that we must think of reality as something that is in constant change.
Think of a typical forest. It changes all the time. You can see traces of how multiple social and ecological processes have shaped it over time and space: exploitation of wood, recreation areas, forest fires, seed dispersal, animal activities, cultural activities, beliefs or taboos. Together they create the forest we see and experience.
“Can we really understand what a forest is without taking into account how it is constantly shaped by past and present processes of interactions?,” asks co-author Maria Mancilla Garcia.
The authors believe “process ontologies”, which focus on concepts such as processes, events and possibilities would be more suitable for the study of SES.
They conclude that such a shift in worldview would enable researchers to understand SES in new ways and support the development of new governance approaches.
"This will enable SES researchers to conceptualize problems and help rethink policies from managing just people and instead managing relations between and among people and the natural system."
Research news | 2020-11-24
While hurdles remain, the region can build on the shared history of collaboration to tackle food system challenges together, new insight papers show
Research news | 2020-11-19
Stephan Barthel, Oonsie Biggs, Örjan Bodin, Thomas Elmqvist, Carl Folke, Per Olsson, Garry Peterson and Johan Rockström on exclusive list of world’s most influential researchers
Research news | 2020-11-18
Four ways to understand the complexity of global environmental change sufficiently well to take policy action
Research news | 2020-11-16
On the island of Stora Karlsö, the steel built lab gives researchers access to observe the largest seabird colony in the Baltic Sea
Research news | 2020-11-13
The clothing industry is dominated by a clutch of powerful companies, but interest groups around them are crucial in efforts to make it more sustainable
Research news | 2020-11-12
The pandemic is hitting the seafood industry hard. How can past crises help it survive this one?