Bildtext får vara max två rader text. Hela texten ska högerjusteras om den bara ska innehålla fotobyline! Photo: B. Christensen/Azote
Why biocultural diversity can contribute to both local and global sustainability
- Biocultural diversity is the notion that biological and cultural diversity are dependent on each other, and that biological diversity is managed, conserved, and created by different cultural groups
- A deeper understanding of this can contribute to local and global sustainability, researchers argue
- The authors call for a biocultural paradigm to be more broadly adopted by academia, practitioners and policy makers
Humans are now the main force and source of changes to our planet. From genes, species, ecosystems, landscapes and seascapes, to languages, practices, traditions, artistic expressions and belief, value, and knowledge systems, these diversities are facing rapid modifications and, most importantly, rapid loss.
Biocultural diversity, is the notion that biological and cultural diversity are dependent on each other, and that biological diversity is managed, conserved, and created by different cultural groups.
In the face of biocultural decline, and in a world that is globalized and increasingly interconnected, a deeper understanding of biocultural diversity can contribute to local and global sustainability.
To strengthen the relevance, centre researcher MariaTengö, along with colleagues from Mexico and South Africa, have published a paper in Global Sustainability that articulates the different dimensions of biocultural discourses and their relevance for addressing sustainability challenges from the local to the global.
The article is part of a special issue on the Programme on Ecosystem change and Society.
The adoption of the biocultural paradigm by academia, practitioners and policy makers may catalyze the joint construction of relevant knowledge, sustainable practices and policies by different social actors.
Maria Tengö, co-author
Biocultural discourses – from academia to policy
In their study, the authors highlight four arenas where the paradigm has been commonly applied:
1. Social-ecological systems and sustainability science
2. anthropological and ethnobiological discourses, largely represented in academic settings
3. Indigenous movements and political ecology
4. intergovernmental platforms, mostly policy context
Through their analysis, the authors draw on the four areas to get a more coherent understanding of how the biocultural paradigm could help push the discourse forward.
As Tengö explains, “The multiple biocultural discourses reflect the diversity of socio-cultural positions, communities of practice, and political orientations involved in their construction and application. Some tensions between these stances are inevitable and can provide meaningful challenges for further dialogue and political changes.”
Specifically, Tengö and her colleagues emphasize an emerging understanding of the biocultural paradigm with the following components:
• A way of defining world, or ontology, that recognizes diversity of cultural embeddedness in nature
• A way of thinking about the world, or epistemology, that takes a holistic or systems thinking approach
• A political and ethical approach that recognizes the role of values, rules and norms, including local governance systems.
Furthermore, Tengö highlights the importance of applying a thoughtful biocultural approach in the policy making arena:
"The lack of biocultural approaches in the formulation of top-down policies by governments operating at all scales may lead to the implementation of culturally inappropriate actions, which can result in unproductive and even harmful processes, generating the loss of control over place, resources, knowledge and practices."
From local landscapes to international policy
Biocultural diversity is often applied to describe local phenomena – traditional knowledge about farming a particular plant species, or indigenous medicinal practices.
While the biocultural paradigm has been used in international policy arenas, such as the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), the authors believe it is decisive to global sustainability for at least four reasons:
1. Global sustainability strongly relies on diversity, and biocultural processes generate and maintain diversity
2. Putting focus on the connections between nature and human well-being, shifting the attention in sustainability debates from economic development to cultural values that guide non-instrumental relationships with nature
3. It is a useful approach for also addressing social justice aspects of sustainability
4. Global sustainability depends on the enactment of culturally pertinent policies that can be articulated across governance levels and actors.
The authors call for a biocultural paradigm to be more broadly adopted by academia, practitioners and policy makers as a way to push relevant knowledge to the forefront of sustainability practices and policies.
"Biocultural discourses hold great transformative potential because it allows for greater emphasis on the connections between cultural and biological diversity, human well-being, social justice and the formulation of culturally pertinent policies," they conclude.
Merçon J., Vetter S., Tengö M., Cocks M., Balvanera P., Rosell J.A., Ayala-Orozco, B. 2019. From local landscapes to international policy: contributions of thebiocultural paradigm to global sustainability. Global Sustainability 2, e7, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2019.4
General news | 2023-02-02
Three quick questions for Marcus Lundstedt, our new head of communications
We welcome Marcus Lundstedt, the centre's new head of communications, and have a quick chat with him about his new role
Research news | 2023-01-30
The best way to deal with shocks is by combining diverse responses
Humankind’s best chance to deal with looming turbulences and crises is by diversifying response strategies
Research news | 2023-01-30
Policymakers need to work more closely with researchers to fight the global food crisis
We are facing the worst food crisis in modern history – Sweden and the EU need to take action to shift how food is produced and consumed. That was the message from researchers to policymakers during a high-level meeting for the Swedish government at Stockholm Resilience Centre
Research news | 2023-01-19
Time for an "IPCC for the ocean"
Leading ocean experts propose a new International Panel for Ocean Sustainability (IPOS) to build consensus and inform policy
Research news | 2023-01-13
Going beyond dichotomies of local versus global food systems
Food systems are becoming increasingly stressed, but whether they are local or global is not the big issue
Research news | 2022-12-22
Overshooting climate targets could significantly increase risk for tipping cascades
Temporarily overshooting the climate targets of 1.5-2 degrees Celsius could increase the tipping risk of several Earth system elements by more than 70 per cent, a new risk analysis study shows