On the other side of the ditch: exploring contrasting ecosystem service coproduction between smallholder and commercial agriculture

Author(s): Malinga, R. H., Jewitt, G., Lindborg, R., Andersson, E. and Gordon, L.
In: Ecology and Society, 23(4):9. doi: 10.5751/ES-10380-230409.
Year: 2018
Type: Journal / article
Theme affiliation: Landscapes
Link to centre authors: Andersson, Erik
Full reference: Malinga, R. H., Jewitt, G., Lindborg, R., Andersson, E. and Gordon, L. 2018. ‘On the other side of the ditch: exploring contrasting ecosystem service coproduction between smallholder and commercial agriculture’, Ecology and Society, 23(4):9. doi: 10.5751/ES-10380-230409.

Summary

Managing for increased multifunctionality of agricultural landscapes is a crucial step toward a sustainable global agriculture. We studied two contrasting agricultural landscapes that exist in parallel on two sides of a ditch in the South African Drakensberg Mountains. The large-scale commercial and smallholder farmers operate within a similar biophysical context but have different farming intensities, management practices, socioeconomic positions, ethnic identities, cultural contexts, and land tenure systems. To assess multifunctionality, we examined the ecosystem services coproduced within these two social-ecological systems, by applying a mixed-method approach combining in-depth interviews, participatory mapping, and expert assessments. The results indicate clear differences between the two farming systems and farmer groups in terms of supply, demand, and the capacity of the farmers to influence ecosystem service production within their landscapes. Commercial farmers can generally produce agricultural products to meet their demand and have the capacity to mitigate land degradation and erosion. Smallholder food production is low, and the demand for ecosystem services is high. Since the smallholders lack the resources to mitigate unsustainable use, this leads to overuse and land degradation. Both landscape types manifest aspects of multifunctionality but vary in the outcomes. Unequal access to land; skills; and natural, financial, and technical resources can hamper multifunctionality and the development toward an equitable and sustainable agriculture in South Africa.

Stockholm Resilience Centre is a collaboration between Stockholm University and the Beijer Institute of Ecological Economics at the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences

Stockholm Resilience Centre
Stockholm University, Kräftriket 2B
SE-10691
Phone: +46 8 674 70 70
info@stockholmresilience.su.se

Organisation number: 202100-3062
VAT No: SE202100306201