Terrestrial nitrogen cycling in Earth system models revisited

Author(s): Stocker, B.D., S. Zaehle, I.C. Prentice, S.E. Cornell, T. Davies-Barnard, A.C. Finzi, O. Franklin, I. Janssens, T. Larmola, S. Manzoni, T. Näsholm, J.A. Raven, K.T. Rebel, S. Reed, S. Vicca, A. Wiltshire.
In: New Phytologist 210: 1165 – 1168.
Year: 2016
Type: Journal / article
Theme affiliation: Complex Adaptive Systems, Landscapes
Link to centre authors: Cornell, Sarah
Full reference: Stocker, B.D., S. Zaehle, I.C. Prentice, S.E. Cornell, T. Davies-Barnard, A.C. Finzi, O. Franklin, I. Janssens, T. Larmola, S. Manzoni, T. Näsholm, J.A. Raven, K.T. Rebel, S. Reed, S. Vicca, A. Wiltshire. 2016. Terrestrial nitrogen cycling in Earth system models revisited. New Phytologist 210: 1165 – 1168.

Summary

Understanding the degree to which nitrogen (N) availability limits land carbon (C) uptake under global environmental change represents an unresolved challenge. First-generation ‘C-only’ vegetation models, lacking explicit representations of N cycling, projected a substantial and increasing land C sink under rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations. This prediction was questioned for not taking into account the potentially limiting effect of N availability, which is necessary for plant growth (Hungate et al., 2003). More recent global models include coupled C and N cycles in land ecosystems (C–N models) and are widely assumed to be more realistic. However, inclusion of more processes has not consistently improved their performance in capturing observed responses of the global C cycle (e.g. Wenzel et al., 2014). With the advent of a new generation of global models, including coupled C, N, and phosphorus (P) cycling, model complexity is sure to increase; but model reliability may not, unless greater attention is paid to the correspondence of model process representations and empirical evidence. It was in this context that the ‘Nitrogen Cycle Workshop’ at Dartington Hall, Devon, UK was held on 1–5 February 2016. Organized by I. Colin Prentice and Benjamin D. Stocker (Imperial College London, UK), the workshop was funded by the European Research Council, project ‘Earth system Model Bias Reduction and assessing Abrupt Climate change’ (EMBRACE). We gathered empirical ecologists and ecosystem modellers to identify key uncertainties in terrestrial C–N cycling, and to discuss processes that are missing or poorly represented in current models.

Share

Stockholm Resilience Centre is a collaboration between Stockholm University and the Beijer Institute of Ecological Economics at the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences

Stockholm Resilience Centre
Stockholm University, Kräftriket 2B
SE-10691
Phone: +46 8 674 70 70
info@stockholmresilience.su.se

Organisation number: 202100-3062
VAT No: SE202100306201